Early Modern England
Commodity and Federation
Shift in eco/social life→social instability in 1500s, unlike in the 1400s
- rising prices, unlike before
- causes of inflation: growing population, inelastic resources
- ppl: 2.4 mil in the beginning of 1500s to 3.3 mil in 1570s
- high fertility rate and falling death rate
Fallout of all the above: social stress
- On the top of the social rank: gents/patricians depend on land income, which was fixed compared to rising price
- therefore, landlord tried to shorten the leases to change price more regularly
- this led the landlords to further “squeeze” the tenants
- encroachments to forest land
- severe tension between landlord and tenants, especially concerning “enclosure”(think of Locke), “sheep eating men”
- population without any land grew
- yeoman farmer benefit and farmers diversified
- dissolution of monasteries, more church land. probably launched by Cromwell to reinforce regal power
- but, most land was rapidly disposed of/sold
- study done in wales: sold 60% of the land by the death of Henry, 75% when Elizabeth enthroned
- land buyers
- gentries/nobles bought most of the land
- sons of gentries/nobles
- upward mobile people, yeoman farmers in particular
- townspeople: lawyers, craftsmen…
- speculators too! who bought and sold land at lightning speed
- as result, relative wealth of gentry class grew, but small farm tenants found it more difficult to make ends meet. also more difficult for the landless to buy land
- wages stagnated for long time, while prices rose.
- research: south of England purchase power of wages fell by approx. 40% between 1510-1550
- hard time for lots of people
- William Harris: “inferior sort of people” lived on “white meats”
- poverty as social problem:
- vagabonds: homeless people everywhere
- laboring poor: more people getting whatever work available, hence vulnerable to contingencies
- however, people at the time saw it as moral problem which could be attributed to faults in specific groups
- Thinking the commonwealth: reformation not only the jurisdictional independence/doctrinal changes, but the revitalization of Christian values
- people proposed christian commonwealth
- however, “covetousness” prevailing the era
- saw change as social dislocation and corruption
- R.H. Tawney: these people at “an age that rediscovered the bible”
- the people wrote pamphlets→proof of “crisis of legitimation”
- also people resisting change, especially in the countryside, where farmers rioted against landlords, sometimes uprising(Pilgrimage of Grace, Camping Time, …)
- Royals not simply repressed upheavals, and sometimes sought for change for farmers’ welfare
- Thomas Smith: did not denounce moral failings of social groups
- had discussions(made up) between different people, different groups voiced different grievances
- conception of increasing government responsibilities
- coinage revalued and reissued
- more open hearings for farmers to voice
- statute of artifices: regulate relationships between employers and employees
- more strict “enclosure”
- poor relief at parish level
Elizabeth and the National Religion
Religious change remained central issue.